A Message Board, Guestbook, or Poll hosted for your website.
Register Login New Posts Chat
Atlanta Biofuels > Forums > Biodiesel Sustainability > Renewable not the same as sustainable
 
Username:
Password:
 

Thread Tools  | Search This Thread 
Reply
 
Author Comment
 
RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    11/05/07 at 08:09 AM
Reply with quote#1

                                                http://www.mauinews.com/news/2007/11/4/04same1104.html


Renewable not the same as sustainable

                                                                                        By HARRY EAGAR, Staff Writer

KAHULUI – As Maui rushes to embrace alternative energy, a local group has formed to push a bottom-up approach to sustainability.

Kelly King, who put together the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance, presented it to about 20 people at a meeting of the Kahului Kiwanis Club this week.

At the heart of her view is the distinction between “renewable” and “sustainable.”

“Renewable energy isn’t always sustainable. People are starting to figure that out,” King said.

Although she never mentioned the name, the other side is represented by BlueEarth Biofuels, which in alliance with Hawaiian Electric Co. is planning a $61 million biodiesel refinery at the Maui Electric Co.’s Waena generating site in Puunene. It would have a capacity of 40 million gallons per year, expandable to 120 million gallons.

King and her husband, Bob, already run 10 biodiesel refineries, with a total capacity less than 40 mg.

That’s the difference, she says, between “two very distinct models,” centralized and decentralized.

She portrays centralized alternative energy as dependent on a “high-density” feedstock (natural gas field, palm oil plantation), long-distance delivery of the raw materials (using a lot of energy to be moved) and “a negative economic balance for the end-user community.”

“This is what we see in petroleum,” King said.

It also describes BlueEarth’s proposal, which would initially import a vegetable oil and, according to King, export the money involved to Mainland investors.

By contrast, a decentralized system uses locally available raw materials in small producing facilities with a short trip to market.

“It keeps energy dollars in the community,” she said.

She said that describes Pacific Biodiesel, which began its operations as a way to dispose of waste cooking oils and has operated at the Central Maui Landfill for a decade. Demand on Maui has expanded beyond the available oil sources, while the company has been contracted to develop similar and larger plants on Oahu, in Japan and elsewhere in the U.S.

All the product (less than a million gallons a year) is sold on Maui.

BlueEarth, responding to criticism of its plan to utilize palm oil, asked the Natural Resources Defense Council to devise a sustainability policy, which was presented at a public meeting in July.

This involves a system of certifying producers and denying certification to any who burn down rain forests to plant oil palms, or who use other objectionable practices.

King says that is not really sustainable.

Among her many objections is that Maui would still be dependent on imports.

“Our goal is to stabilize fuel prices,” she said.

But that will never be achieved, she said, if Maui is at the mercy of decisions made in the Middle East or Indonesia.

BlueEarth and HECO said they plan to encourage local production of a feedstock crop, although which crop is still up for discussion.

That is almost the only point upon which the dueling sustainability advocates agree.

King said she foresees local production of virgin oils, since the supply of recyclable oils and fats is limited.

She tackled the “food vs. fuel” argument, which says that in a hungry world it is unwise to turn food products into fuel.

King noted that some biofuel crops are inedible, such as jatropha.

“But what if we did anyway . . . and there was a big disaster and the issue was whether to eat or to drive? We could eat our fuel crop,” she said.

The Sustainable Biofuels Alliance, in cooperation with other renewable fuels advocates, will devise a competing system of sustainable guidelines.

A logo (three green droplets) will someday allow customers to identify which kind of sustainability their biofuel is promoting – the centralized, BlueEarth/

NRDC approach or the decentralized Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance approach.

“Sustainable biofuels standards, when implemented, will provide both the industry and the consumer with the confidence that the fuel they are using meets performance requirements,” according to a Sustainable Bio-diesel Alliance explanation of its purpose. More information is available at http://www.sustainable

biodieselalliance.com.

As Pacific Biodiesel expands its reach, the Kings are improving on their technology, Kelly King said, and they are refining their decentralization concept.

Their Sequential Pacific Biofuels refinery in Salem, Ore., is being expanded from 1 million gallons a year to 5 million gallons, and improved processing technology will mean total recycling of byproducts, she said.

She was pleased that Oregon’s legislature, which like Hawaii’s has passed a law to encourage renewables, requires that feedstocks be local. So palm oil is out, although Oregon produces raw materials such as canola oil and beef tallow.

King’s example of an almost perfect local, decentralized system is the Pacific Biodiesel Texas refinery in Carls Corner, Texas.

King said the local cotton gin was about to close. Part of the reason was that it couldn’t find a market for its cottonseed.

It was getting only about 13 cents a pound for it.

Cottonseed oil can be used to make fuel, and singer Willie Nelson, who is part of the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance, encouraged the century-old cotton-processing plant to hang in there until the 2.5 million gallon per year biodiesel refinery is in operation.

Pacific Biodiesel Texas agreed to pay 21 or 22 cents per pound for the cottonseed, which King says has revived local agriculture.

There will be virtually zero transportation costs, in money or energy, to distribute the biodiesel, since it will be piped across a street to Nelson’s Carls Corner truck stop, which can handle the entire output of fuel.

That’s the model, King said: local raw materials, local producers, local jobs, local investment and local sales.

“Our mantra is, all sustainability is local.”

Annie Nelson is co-chairwoman of the SBA board of directors, along with entertainer Daryl Hannah.

Kelly King is vice chairwoman, Bob King is treasurer and Maui lawyer Ed Zwick is secretary.

Other members of a still-expanding board are Michael Bowman of 25 x 25 Group, Kent Bullard of the Los Angeles Coop, Edward Hsi of the Borneo Foundation, Suzanne Hunt of Worldwatch Institute, Laura Louie and Carolyn Mugar of FarmAid.

Eventually, King says, there will be two boards, a working board and the celebrity board that will help promote the alliance’s program.

Harry Eagar can be reached at heagar@mauinews.com

Annie1
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 4

    11/22/07 at 04:16 PM
Reply with quote#2

Kelly King's Pacific Biodiesel Corporate Empire (disguised as an independent entity called "the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance") should not be defining the sustainability standard for biodiesel in this country...that should be left to the globally recognized experts at respected environmental policy- advising organizations such as the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).  Leaving the definition of 'sustainability' to Kelly King, Pacific Biodiesel and their Hollywood investors instead of this country's qualified independent environmental experts is definitely putting the fox in charge of the hen-house.

The NRDC has developed a highly praised sustainable biodiesel policy that encourages locally grown feedstock to be used for production and forbids the use of any feedstock from deforested lands or feedstock grown in an unsustainable manner.  Individual biodiesel manufacturers such as Pacific Biodiesel should not be trusted to develop their own definition of sustainability to suit their own profit motives and corporate growth strategies.

For more info on the NRDC's sustainable biodiesel policy go to:
http://www.nrdc.org/media/2007/070821.asp
http://www.nrdc.org/energy/oheco_cavanagh.asp
RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    11/25/07 at 10:45 AM
Reply with quote#3

While you make a good point about producers regulating themselves, I think a closer look at Pacific would reveal that hey have a long history of producing biodiesel using sustainable methods and feedstocks .

The SBA itself has grown out of the the  "grassroots" biodiesel movement which has long been critical of the large corporate virgin oil biodiesel industry  (i.e. NBB).

I do not think the proposed role of the SBA is to regulate anything. It is my understanding that it is intended to identify and label/score/rate/rank biodiesel on metrics that one concerned with sustainability would want to measure,and to publicize these metrics...correct me if I am wrong.

I feel that while any definition or method of scoring biodiesel as "sustainable"must conform to standards that satisfy non-commercial interests, any involvement in this movement by producers should be encouraged.

To date, I am not aware of any specific definition of sustainable that has been proposed by the SBA. The SBA is very young and is still trying to determine its form. The idea of getting celebrity supporters (and funding) is simply a way to raise the profile of the issue, which is really the heart of the matter.

Let's face it...responsibly produced biodiesel will be the only way a small-scale local biodiesel producer will be able to differentiate itself and its product from that of the major corporate Argi-business producers. For a small producer to be actively involved defining this difference and in making consumers aware of it does indeed help protect their ability to exist in the marketplace, however this should not necessarily be viewed as a bad thing (although it should be carefully watched). It is true that the bulk of the forming members of the SBS are actively involved in making or selling biodiesel and that they are motivated by this, however one needs to look at how and why they make biodiesel.

In the end the formation of the SBA is a logical  result of the efforts of (more) responsible biodiesel producers to differentiate their product from less responsible producers. As long as the method of differentiation is logical, honest, and unbiased participation in defining the method should be open to any/all stake holders.

It will be interesting to see what the SBA comes up with.

While the NRDC's definition is a good starting point, I think you will find that it is VERY broad and still provides no basis for measuring the multitude of factors that play into a measure of sustainability.
A label or rating (perhaps modeled after the LEED system) that communicates parameters such as:
-Domestic vs. non domestic feedstock
-Local or non-local domestic feedstock (perhaps with a score based on distance transported).
-Organic or non-organic feedstock
-Responsibly farmed feedstock
-Virgin or byproduct feeedstock
-Local or non-local production (score based on distance finished product traveled)
-Measure relating to side-stream/waste management.
-Measure relating to energy balance / efficiency of production method.
...and on and on.

These are of the factors that a biodiesel consumer motivated by sustainability would need to be aware of in order to differentiate one biodiesel from another.
In my opinion it has more to do with proper communication/labeling so that a biodiesel consumer knows what they are buying so they can make their decision based on whatever their motivation is.

I plan to participate in this and I would encourage you to be involved if you have any concerns about the proper motivation. The more people with varied interests involved will help ensure a system that works to achieve not only the goals of the producers, but that of all stakeholders.


Annie1
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 4

    11/25/07 at 02:37 PM
Reply with quote#4

The Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance needs to be more than an Industry Marketing Ploy

Although the intentions of Kelly King’s Pacific Biodiesel Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance appear commendable, the execution should make every concerned citizen and serious environmentalist cringe:  1.) An industry developed certification plan/standard created by for-profit biodiesel producers with no nationally recognized environmental organization sponsorship or endorsement,  2.) No academic peer review process  (a mandatory component for academic and scientific credibility),  3.) No independent third party ongoing audit of producers (a certification program cannot be credible without this element).

There is one of the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance’s positions that does make sense if properly detailed and documented (right now it is just a high-level concept) regarding Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the various feedstock used:   North American Canola and Soybeans (as well as their yellow-grease remnants) have huge greenhouse gas emissions problems associated with their farming, fertilization and processing practices,  a serious environmental problem that must be remedied before they qualify as acceptable input products for SBA certification (much as the NRDC has recently required of the Palm Oil industry, see previous post).  

 One cannot judge the intentions of Kelly King’s Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance, but unfortunately all signs point straight to the profit-line (i.e. an industry marketing ploy).  I hope the moderator didn’t gave away the plot in his last post when responding, “Let's face it...responsibly produced biodiesel will be the only way a small-scale local biodiesel producer will be able to differentiate itself and its product from that of the major corporate Argi-business producers.”

 Serious environmental market-changing endeavors can be successfully accomplished (such as the NRDC and their contemporaries tackle successfully as a way of life without ever green-washing the end-policy to suit any particular industry’s profit motives), but they are not an undertaking for amateur  environmentalists nor for biased industry stakeholders.  Consumers and retailers will have a tough time buying into any so-called environmental accreditation program or accept its results without a strong and credible 3rd party scientific environmental basis & endorsement (including proper academic peer review) and ongoing credible 3rd party audit to validate producer compliance, no matter how many well-intentioned celebrities may endorse it.

RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    11/25/07 at 04:30 PM
Reply with quote#5

Hi Annie,
All of your points are well taken.

However, you seem to assume that participation in the efforts of the SBA are somehow limited to those in the biodiesel business. As far as I know, this is not the case. Membership, participation and leadership in the SBA is open to anyone who wants to get involved (again, correct me if I am mistaken).

While criticism is healthy, required, and encouraged, active participation is far more valuable. Perhaps you should consider getting involved.
Are you an SBA member?
Is the SBA a for-profit entity?
Is there anything limiting the efforts of the SBA to the exclusion of organizations like NRDC?
Is there any reason the work of the SBAcould not be subject to peer-review?

As far a I know,there is not even a proposal on the table of how the SBA plans to address the issues of labeling/ranking/certification etc. So before we are too critical of its efforts we should either participate in the design of the system, or be critical of the system proposed.

Also, your assumption that the SBA has no participation from any credible environmental non-profits is incorrect. I work for the Southern Alliance for Clean Energy ( http://www.cleanenergy.org ). A nationally recognized "strong and credible" environmental non-profit organization. I do not think such participants would be accurately defined as "amateur  environmentalists"

-full disclosure...You should know that I am also involved in commercial biodiesel production. Our program however is a 501c3 non-profit and any/all revenues go to help fund the policy work of the Southern Alliance. Our program  uses only locally collected waste fryer oil.

I do not think there is any "plot"other than a way to differentiate products (which can benefit both consumers and producers).
The same plot attempted by the early organic food growers..which of course has been co-opted by the "industrial organic"producers. We should learn lessons from what has happened in the organic movement.

Again, I agree that efforts like those by the SBA could pan out to be nothing more than marketing (similar to the NBB), but only if others do not get directly involved.
RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    11/25/07 at 05:26 PM
Reply with quote#6

The SBA mission and draft of principles can be found at:

http://www.sustainablebiodieselalliance.com/principles.html
Annie1
Registered: 11/22/07
Posts: 4

    11/25/07 at 06:09 PM
Reply with quote#7

Thanks Robert for the thoughtful response,

I am fully involved in important enviromental causes already but feel it would be paramount for the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance to secure the full participation and endorsement by the Natural Resources Defense Council http://www.nrdc.org/.  Without this, it may be difficult to convince consumers that the SBA is prescribing a better path for the planet (as compared to your agri-business competitors).

I understand that there are marketing goals underlying the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance's charter, but be advised that you may not like the answers that the environmental scientific community may come up with as being 'sustainable' for your industry (waste fryer oil biodiesel).  In fact you probably believe in your heart that you are already being sustainable, but the scientific evidence may prove otherwise.  Be prepared to face scientific reality for the health of the planet, regardless of the results. Achiveing sustainability for your product may perhaps even mean no soybean or canola oil or its yellow-grease remnants until those industries can prove (per guidelines established by environmental science) that their products are not diminishing the environment. I don't know if this can currently be proven as true, nor will we ever know without credible scientific participation.

I understand your passion and committment Robert but if and when you get nationally respected environmental scientists involved in the policy development process (again, please consider the NRDC), subscribe to full acadamic peer review of your policy and its drafts, and guarantee 3rd party ongoing audit of producers once the program is established (which will not come cheap), then there will be many environmentalist willing to take a second look at the Sustainable Bioidiesel Alliance as being more than a just a marketing tool for your specific industry.  
RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    11/25/07 at 10:46 PM
Reply with quote#8

It was pointed out tome that in the previous posts I was mistakenly using "SBS" interchangeably with "SBA".
Just to make a clarification-
SBS (sustainable biodiesel summit) is the grassroots biodiesel community's annual conference which has been bootstrapped by volunteers.

SBA (sustainable biodiesel alliance) is a separate legal entity with similar goals with leadership provided mainly from Kelly King.
One goal has be developing sustainability criteria.

I have made a few edits to my above posts to reflect this.

Annie,you make valid points and I hope you continue to help keep an eye on the way things develop.I also encourage your participation as time allows.


In the end...using a 2500lb piece of machinery that operates at less than 30% efficiency to transport 150lb person will never be sustainable regardless of fuel choice, so all of this is a matter of degree within that perspective.

RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    11/27/07 at 09:10 AM
Reply with quote#9

Annie,
I could not help but notice your personal email address ends in "biodieseltruth.org".

I wanted to find out more about "biodieseltruth.org"as it sounded like an organization  I would be interested in.

While there currently is no website located at biodieseltruth.org, I did notice that the domain is registered by Landis Maez.

Landis Maez is an ex-Chevron employee and the managing partner of BlueEarh Biofuels...the company proposing to build the 40million gal/yr palm oil based biodiesel plant on Maui.  This plant of course would be a direct competitor of the waste oil-based Pacific Biodiesel (Bob and Kelly King).

So you have direct ties to Landis Maez's "Biodieseltruth.org", which appears to be directly tied to BlueEarth Biofuels. Not exactly an unbiased position with regards to Kelly King and Pacific Biodiesel.  This also sheds light on your leanings specifically towards the NRDC who has come under criticism by other national environmental organizations such as Environmental Defense and The Sierra Club for its (NRDC's) position on the matter of palm oil-based biodiesel.

While your posts attempt to come across as strictly environmentally concerned and highly fearful of green-washing and marketing ploys, you failed to disclose what appears to be direct ties to a biodiesel producer. Not that (as stated in my previous posts) I  think being a biodiesel producers should exclude your involvement, after all Kelly King is a producer as am I, but let's at least be open and honest about our involvement and motives.

Look, The SBA may not be perfect and it will need to be under the close eye of those not involved with the business of biodiesel, but from what I can tell it is off to a good start on a long uphill challenge. If you are truly concerned about the development of a scientific peer-reviewed methodology of differentiating the sustainability of biodiesel, I say get involved but based on the above, I question that this is at the heart of your motivation.




*All claims made in this post welcome to peer-review

More information:
"biodieseltruth.org" WHOIS Internic Search Results:
http://www.networksolutions.com/whois/results.jsp?domain=biodieseltruth.org

http://honoluluweekly.com/diary/2007/04/proposed-biofuel-plant-surprises-some/

http://starbulletin.com/2007/05/26/news/whatever.html

http://www.hi.sierraclub.org/maui/ParsonMauiTime.html

http://www.hi.sierraclub.org/maui/biodiesel.html

http://www.maui-tomorrow.org/issues/energy/07/04_18biofuel.html

http://12.169.112.47/news/2007/8/21/02eis0821.html

-----------whois data as of 12/27/07 -----------------------------

Domain ID148061424-LROR
Domain Name:BIODIESELTRUTH.ORG
Created On:09-Jun-2007 21:02:55 UTC
Last Updated On:09-Aug-2007 03:55:33 UTC
Expiration Date:09-Jun-2008 21:02:55 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Melbourne IT, Ltd. dba Internet Names Worldwide (R52-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:C118141648595778
Registrant Name:LANDIS MAEZ
Registrant Organizationrivate Registration US
Registrant Street1 O Box 99800
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:EmeryVille
Registrant State/Province:CA
Registrant Postal Code:94662
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.5105952002
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:contact@myprivateregistration.com
Admin ID:C118141648595775
Admin Name:Admin PrivateRegContact
Admin Organizationrivate Reg US
Admin Street1 O Box 99800
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:EmeryVille
Admin State/Province:CA
Admin Postal Code:94662
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.5105952002
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:contact@myprivateregistration.com
Tech ID:C118141648595777
Tech Name:TECH PrivateRegContact
Tech Organizationrivate Reg US
Tech Street1 O Box 99800
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:EmeryVille
Tech State/Province:CA
Tech Postal Code:94662
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.5105952002
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:contact@myprivateregistration.com
Name Server:YNS1.YAHOO.COM
Name Server:YNS2.YAHOO.COM
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:
Name Server:

RobertD
Moderator
Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 586

    02/17/08 at 10:08 AM
Reply with quote#10

related:

http://www.savetheorangutan.co.uk/?p=914

Hawaii Environmental Organizations Urge Leaders to Reject Imported Palm Oil, Seek Locally Sustainable Energy Strategies

                                                               

Coalition of groups intensifies public education efforts as world leaders gather in Honolulu for Energy Security and Climate Change meetings

January 27, 2008

For more information contact:
Rob Parsons, 808-280-1369

MAUI-As a major climate change meeting of the world’s 16 biggest carbon-emitting nations is held in Honolulu, local environmental and cultural organizations are calling for an end to plans to open up a “palm oil pipeline” from Southeast Asia to Hawai`i.
Members of several environmental, cultural, and student organizations will conduct educational demonstrations to coincide with the Major Economies Meeting on Energy Security and Climate Change (MEM), to be held at the University of Hawaii East-West Center this week.
Hawaii is the most petroleum-dependent state in terms of electrical production, with over 90 percent of the state’s energy needs coming from imported oil. Despite abundant potential for solar, wind and wave power, the Hawaiian Electric Company (HECO) has spent the past year supporting proposals to construct two huge biodiesel refineries by Imperium Renewables on Oahu, and by BlueEarth Biodiiesel LLC on Maui. If constructed, their combined production, 220 million gallons yearly, exceeds the potential output that could be produced in Hawai`i, even if all available statewide agricultural lands were utilized solely for biofuel crops. The companies intend to import palm oil and these refineries will be among the largest palm oil refineries in the United States.
“Switching from imported petroleum to imported palm oil does nothing for Hawaii’s energy security”, said Lance Holter, Chairman of the Sierra Club-Maui Group. “We have abundant local energy resources we should be utilizing, including solar, wind, and wave technologies.”
“The world community knows that palm oil plantations in Indonesia, Malaysia, and elsewhere are an ecological disaster with immense negative climate impacts”, said Rob Parsons, Executive Vice President of Maui Tomorrow Foundation. “Palm and soy plantations are destroying biodiverse rainforests and peat swamps, creating huge carbon emissions through slash and burn clearing, threatening endangered species, and trampling on the rights of indigenous people. Why in the world would Hawaii’s leaders choose to be a partner to all of that?”
According to Kasha Ho`okili Ho of San Francisco’s Rainforest Action Network, “The world’s rainforests are our last, best defense against catastrophic climate change. Agribusiness companies are tearing down rainforests in places like Malaysia and Indonesia to produce palm oil biodiesel which they are then marketing as a solution to global warming. Their false solutions aren’t making the world safer, they are just making a corporate profit.”
According to Environmental Defense scientist Stephanie Fried, a former Fulbright Scholar who conducted research in Indonesia with East Kalimantan forest communities, “This month, Smithsonian scientists found that biofuels made from palm oil may be worse overall than fossil fuels. This comes as no surprise to anyone who has ever visited these palm oil plantations.”
Last summer, HECO held public meetings to discuss possible criteria for procurement of “sustainable palm oil”. More than fifty local and international organizations registered concerns with the draft language. Another 8,000 people sent e-mails to Governor Linda Lingle, urging her to veto a bill to provide state Special Revenue Bond Funding to support $59 million of the funding for the BlueEarth Biodiesel facility on Maui.
“We are educating our leaders to help them understand the huge difference between small, local steps towards sustainable production of biodiesel crops, and the importation of oil from huge mono-crop plantations thousands of miles from Hawaii, with a track record of deforestation and human rights exploitation”, said Annie Nelson of the Sustainable Biodiesel Alliance.
According to Kelly King of Hawaii’s homegrown company Pacific Biodiesel, which since 1996 has produced transportation fuel from used restaurant oil, “Rapid expansion is risky, and over-sizing a biodiesel refinery to accommodate mega-million gallons of imported oil discourages local efforts to plant and harvest crops. It is critical that our state move toward true sustainability with the understanding that all sustainability is local. We call on our leaders to learn the difference between green and “greenwashing.”
Renewable energy advocate Henry Curtis of Life of the Land (Hawaii) objected to the closed-door meetings held with the world’s top producing nations of carbon emissions and other greenhouse gasses. “This secret exclusive meeting includes the largest polluters on earth but excludes their devastated victims, including the vulnerable Pacific Island Nations that are most susceptible to rising sea levels from global warming.
On Wednesday afternoon, January 30 at 4:30, the Sierra Club, Hawaii Chapter is organizing Project Blue Line, as a visual demonstration of the impacts of a projected one meter sea level rise by the end of this century. For more info, contact: hawaii.chapter@sierraclub.org or call 538-6616.
“Hawai`i has a chance to show the world how sustainable energy production can be done, and that what’s sustainable can also be profitable”, said Parsons. “Let’s move away from damaging proposals such as the import of palm oil. This is our golden opportunity to influence our leaders and return the “power to the people”.



Previous Thread | Next Thread
Reply

 
Bookmarks
 
Digg Diggdel.icio.us del.icio.usStumbleUpon StumbleUponGoogle Google